Skip to main content
The evidence pack is a single PDF bundling your firm’s AI governance records, built for handing to an insurer, an assessor or a client who has asked hard questions. Open Evidence Pack from the left-hand navigation. The page shows your GUARD Score and pillar breakdown, a preview of the cover, and a contents list with the status of each section and any gaps. Select Export evidence pack (PDF) to download it. Export history lists your last five exports, each with its fingerprint. Anyone with a login at your firm can export the pack.

What is inside

Front matter: a cover page, your firm details, and a table of contents. Then 17 evidence sections, each tagged with the clause it answers: The pack is a snapshot of your records at the moment you export it. Each export is logged in the audit trail with a SHA-256 fingerprint of the file, so you can later prove which copy you sent.

Disclosure and training are included

The pack includes your client disclosure statement (clause 4.3) and your training records (section 2, clauses 3.1 and 3.2). If a section has nothing recorded, the pack says so plainly. Check the contents list for gaps before you export.

On the audit trail section

The pack includes a summary of your audit trail: governance events by type, the period covered and the 10 most recent. The log is append-only: no one can edit or delete an event. Each export is fingerprinted, and the fingerprint is shown under Export history. See the audit trail.

The GUARD Score on the cover

The pack leads with your GUARD Score. That is a guardbook measure of how complete your records are. It is not a RICS measure, RICS does not recognise it, and a high score is not a statement of compliance. It is useful as a completeness check on your own file, and as a way of showing an insurer that the firm is engaged. It is not a certificate, so do not present it as one. See GUARD Score.

Before you export

Worth ten minutes:
1

Is your current policy version adopted?

An unadopted policy in the pack is the first thing a reader will notice.
2

Are the tools in the register the tools in use?

A tool used in anger but missing from the register is worse than an untidy register.
3

Do your risks have scores?

Unscored risks appear with a dash instead of a score and RAG rating.
4

Does the Oversight Log show real judgement?

A log where every output was used as-is invites the question of whether anyone was really applying professional scepticism.